No, I’ve made a personal assessment of your intelligence level and or your ability to think critically after reading your comment. So, yes, for you, that’s all I can muster.
Pro-nuclearism is the future of the the world wide environmental- and climate movements. Some will of course cling on to the old ways, but the reformation is coming.
All of assertions in this article are backed by links to relevant sources. "JIm" hate follows me to make ad hominem attacks because he's a Friends of the Earth activist. Best to ignore him.
As a Friends of the Earth activist, that means he's supporting an antinuclear agenda by an organization that was bribed in the 1960s to adopt antinuclearism by Atlantic Richfield. They were scared that nuclear power was going to displace bunker oil as an electricity fuel source. And it did. By 1990, nuclear power had nearly eliminated bunker oil as electricity source. Rumania's two nuclear power plants at Cernavoda were built explicitly with that in mind, as was Point Lepreau in New Brunswick, Canada.
Nice, especially the last sentence. I totally agree.
'Friends of (Which) Earth'
No, I’ve made a personal assessment of your intelligence level and or your ability to think critically after reading your comment. So, yes, for you, that’s all I can muster.
My god, you're a dipshit.
No he's just a typical troll.
Pro-nuclearism is the future of the the world wide environmental- and climate movements. Some will of course cling on to the old ways, but the reformation is coming.
Can you provide evidence to highlight the lies in this article so that we can judge for ourselves and learn what to look out for?
All of assertions in this article are backed by links to relevant sources. "JIm" hate follows me to make ad hominem attacks because he's a Friends of the Earth activist. Best to ignore him.
As a Friends of the Earth activist, that means he's supporting an antinuclear agenda by an organization that was bribed in the 1960s to adopt antinuclearism by Atlantic Richfield. They were scared that nuclear power was going to displace bunker oil as an electricity fuel source. And it did. By 1990, nuclear power had nearly eliminated bunker oil as electricity source. Rumania's two nuclear power plants at Cernavoda were built explicitly with that in mind, as was Point Lepreau in New Brunswick, Canada.
You want to end all fossil fuel extraction? Then stop using it yourself immediately.
The "jobs" people will eventually develop a consensus approach to the snobs. Politically, it won't be very retty.
What lies?