Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Colin Hunt's avatar

In a very real sense, energy density is the technical history of humanity. The first artificial heat used by humans came with the discovery of fire about 800,000 years ago. Fire, along with clothing and shelter, was one of the key technologies which permitted humans to migrate to temperate climates from the purely subtropics.

Fire made possible the smelting of iron. First used and smelted about 3000 BC, iron required much higher temperatures than simple cooking fires to forge into tools or weapons. That in turn required more efficient fuels containing greater heating ability than wood, such as charcoal.

As Zion rightly noted, uranium is the most energy dense fuel source ever discovered. That means its fuel produces a huge amount of energy per unit of mass. The typical fuel requirement of one modern nuclear power reactor is about 150 tonnes of uranium-oxide fuel. Gathered in one place, this mass of fuel would form a cube of about three metres. The same size of coal-fired station would consume several million tonnes of coal annually. It would need so much coal that it would be receiving one large 100-car coal train about twice a week.

So as a species our entire existence is dependent upon high energy density fuels. And this dependence on energy density increases as our knowledge and technology grows. Increasing energy density is the only way to expand the benefits of energy use and technology to those parts of the world currently lacking it.

Expand full comment
steven lightfoot's avatar

Yes correct. Energy/power density is one of the most important factors when considering different sources. The importance of this parameter is usually under-appreciated by energy pundits, especially those without an engineering background.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts